Sunday, October 16, 2005
Hillary Clinton's campaign knew how to comply with Federal Election Regulations as shown by Hillary's report of professional services, valued at $2000 for each photograph taken by her friend and celebrity photographer Annie Liebovitz, of each $25,000 contributor to Hillary's campaign.
As required by FEC regulations, when professional services are contributed to help a federal candidate raise funds, those services must be reported as an "in kind" contribution by the service provider or producer, based on the fair market value of those services. However, when it came to the fair market value of the professional services that Peter Paul had eight international singing stars contribute to help Hillary raise hard dollar contributions through the Gala concert, no similar report was made!
Hillary witnessed the services being provided by Cher, Diana Ross, Patti La Belle, Tony Braxton, Melissa Ethridge, Michael Bolton, Sugar Ray and Paul Anka, and yet she did not have ANY of their service contributions reported as she did with Annie Liebovitz. This amounted to an additional $1 million in in kind contributions being hidden by Hillary's campaign.
They have proven time and time again that the law as only broken if proven. How do you prove it, through the courts that they control? Do a little research and you will find that in every case the judge has made remarks to the jury that are considered grounds for appeal and even could be removed from the bench (freedom of information act). Or many time the cases are dismissed even before making it to trial. This is what me the people are willing to accept. We should all rebel and protest, but we are all to busy surviving to be bothered with the loosing of our freedoms while the criminals run free. I leave you with this thought.
If we don’t pay a parking ticket are we allowed to blame it on the car and just walk away with no repercussion?
It's a disservice to the American people that Hillary Clinton didn't face at least three counts of fraud and continues to dodge this.
The court hearing on Paul VS Clinton won't happen until 2-3 days after the Pennsylvania primary.
Have the media been threatened with lawsuits or turn a blind eye to this for other reasons?
Do you not believe this article about the Clintons because you truly believe that they are innocent? Or, do you just plan to support the Clintons, no matter what they do? The article is legit, and to be exact Peter Paul is not a bum, he has plenty of money to do and buy whatever he wants. Now Mrs. Clinton has a very long history of being dishonest. I know it is hard when you really want to believe in someone that you consider to have great character and integrity. But the facts are the facts.
If Hillary did nothing wrong, then why would she ask Paul to lie about his campaign financing for her?
Also, check out a few dishonest doings by Hillary:
1. She was fired by one of the prosecuters for hiding files from the Watergate Scandal.
2. She defended a rapist against a 12yr old girl and ended up putting the victim on trial.
3. When she worked for the Rose Law Clinic she hid files that proved the law firm was over billing their clients. Some of these files, along with Whitewater was discovered in a vacant room in the White House when Bill was pres.
4. Claimed that she and Chelsea were under sniper fire in Bosnia.
5. Lied that she did not know who Tony Rezco was. She and Bill posed with him for for the camera, during Bill run for pres.
If you do not believe me, just google. Believe me, you will get more than you bargained for.
people will find out the truth and they must decide for themselves.
I admire your courage and persistence, whoever you are.
Our media outlet is a joke!!!!!! God Bless Obama and God help America.